|
Many physicians do not fully understand
the proper role of opioids in the treatment of injured workers
and they do not understand the importance of a biopsychosocial,
whole-person approach as promoted in the evidence-based and presumptively
correct California DWC Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule (MTUS)
Chronic Pain Medical Treatment Guideline .
The Introduction to this Guideline attempts to establish a conceptual
framework for understanding and treating chronic pain including
the prescription of opioids and other treatments.
The issue of appropriate current and future use of opioids
in the treatment of Chronic Pain is complex, controversial, and timely.
On one side we have the ever increasing problem of increasing deaths
and dysfunction from the inappropriate use of prescription opioids,
and on the other we have the needs of patients for adequate pain
control to facilitate comfort, activity and function. For the practitioner
and patient, achieving a balance across the spectrum of outcomes
from pain alleviation, untoward side effects, aberrant drug related
behavior, drug addiction, drug abuse, drug diversion and potential
death, remains problematic.
Scientific studies have shown a dramatic increase in accidental
deaths associated with the use of prescription opioids and also
an increasing average daily morphine equivalent dose (MED) for
the most potent opioids over the past decade. In response to the
increasing morbidity and mortality associated with the increasing
use of opioids, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
has released several recommendations for health care providers .
The recommendations include the notion that use of opioid medications
for acute and/or chronic pain should only take place after a determination
has been made that alternative therapies have not provided adequate
pain relief. Additionally, the lowest effective dose of opioids
should be used. Behavioral screening, patient agreements, random,
periodic, and targeted urine testing for opioids and other drugs
should be strongly considered in patients with noncancer pain,
who has been treated with opioids for more than six weeks. If or
when a patient’s MED has increased to 120
mg per day or more, without substantial improvement in function
and pain, the treating physician should seek advice from a pain
specialist.
Use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) remains controversial .
A 2007 systematic review indicated no clear efficacy of long-term
opiate therapy for chronic back pain because no studies have evaluated
opiate use beyond 16 weeks and
data on the long-term effectiveness of opioids for CNCP are sparse,
with inconclusive or mixed results.
Although extensive clinical experience suggests that opioids can
improve pain and function in some patients,
a significant proportion experience no improvement or worsening of
symptoms. Because opioid
use is often associated with a variety of potentially serious adverse
outcomes, including harms related to drug abuse and diversion.
Additionally, there have been increasing reports of problems associated
with chronic opioid therapy. Although opiates remain an important
tool in reducing pain, it is important that the prescribing physician
appreciate the potential adverse effects that may occur with chronic
opioid administration, such as immune dysfunction, endocrine
deficiencies, sleep
disorders, and
hyperalgesia.
Tolerance to the analgesic
effects of an opioid occurs after its chronic administration, a pharmacological
phenomenon that has been associated with the development of abnormal
pain sensitivity such as hyperalgesia. This clinical phenomenon causes
the patient to experience pain that is significantly more intense
than the pain anticipated from actual injury and is caused by 1)
decreased tolerance of pain, 2) hypersensitivity of the nerves, and
3) the patient's expectation of the occurrence of pain. Studies have
shown opiates produce a long-lasting hyperalgesia that increases
in magnitude and duration with continued use.
Although it is true that physician acceptance of opioid analgesic
usage has relaxed over the years, it remains important to evaluate
each patient individually, to ensure effective treatment. In general,
there is a belief today that opioids (despite their potential for
problems) have a place in the physician’s treatment armamentarium
when other methods have failed and when the use of opioids use results
in less pain, more function and manageable side-effects.
Assuming
non-opioid treatment approaches have failed and that there is adequate
pathology to support the use of opioids, the clinician must determine
that the use of opioids is beneficial and that the benefits outweigh
the risks.
The physician can make this determination using the Four “A’s” of
Pain Treatment Outcomes which
include: 1) adequate Analgesia (pain relief); 2) improved Activities
of Daily Living (physical and psychosocial functioning); 3) manageable
or no Adverse effects (untoward side effects); and 4) no evidence
of Aberrant drug taking (addiction-related outcomes).
I want to emphasize that symptoms of pain even with reported “benefit” with
opioids is not an adequate basis for opioid prescription absent a
pathological process consistent with the pain complaints. Opioids
are used illicitly for non-pain purposes in our society for both
pleasure and habituation (physical dependence and addiction). Considering
the controversy and potential danger of opioids, their use must be
weighed against the risks associated with use. In other words, the
use of opioids for benign musculoskeletal conditions is not medically
indicated or reasonable.
Special attention must also be paid to individuals
who have a predilection to opioid overuse and abuse. This includes
those with a prior history of substance abuse but also people with
a history of adverse childhood experiences.
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) including abuse (physical, emotional,
sexual, etc.), neglect (physical, emotional, etc.), household dysfunction
(violence, mental illness, drug abuse, etc., in the home), and exposure
to traumatic stressors increase the likelihood of chronic disability
and prescription drug abuse in adulthood.
The 2008 ACOEM updated
Chronic Pain Chapter Guidelines (I was on the Panel and served
as Associate Editor), suggests that opioids should not be used when
there is no evidence that they provide increased function in life.
Further, it is also recommended that patients on chronic opioid therapy
go through a weaning process to see whether the opioids truly make
any difference in function and pain management.
In cases where opioids are to be used, they should provide cost effective
benefit; less pain and more function with manageable side effects.
We should not use a particular opioid when something less costly
(i.e., Methadone or a generic drug – assuming efficacy) is
available or when there is an alternative available with lesser potential
problems such as acetaminophen, NSAIDs, anti-neuropathics, etc.,
or with functional restoration approaches including education, cognitive
behavior therapy, meditation, exercise, and physical rehabilitation.
In fact, there is good evidence of cost-effectiveness when a functional
restoration approach is provided as an adjunct and concomitantly
with medication and interventional approaches.
Once patients have
demonstrated improvement in function, concomitant reduction in pain
supports attempts to minimize the opioid dose. This should be done
slowly and methodically, in conjunction with careful monitoring of
the patient’s clinical and functional status. Under such circumstances
it is sometimes possible to completely wean the patient from opioids
after several months.
If attempts at weaning are accompanied by worsened functional performance,
the medication dose can be reinstituted and, perhaps, weaning attempted
again after the patient has stabilized. If weaning remains problematic,
it is only then that consideration be given to maintenance, long-term
opioid use.
Patients considered for long-term opioid use must be
made aware of risks and benefits including the aforementioned long
term potential adverse effects of opioids: tolerance, addiction,
hypogonadism (with secondary osteoporosis) and opioid induced hyperalgesia.
If long-term treatment with an opioid is undertaken for chronic pain,
periodic monitoring is essential to optimize benefit and minimize
risk during the course of treatment. All
patients maintained on chronic opioid therapy should review and sign
a formal opioid agreement/contract, to include random urine drug
screens.
The Official Disability Guidelines (I serve on the ODG Medical
Editorial Advisory Board) has established criteria for using of opioids.
Briefly, the use of opioids should be part of a treatment plan that
is tailored to the patient. Reasonable alternatives to treatment
should have been tried. Is the patient likely to improve and has
the patient at risk for abuse or addiction? If opioids are not effective,
dose escalation may not prove beneficial. Is there pathology to justify
use of opioids? Is there psychiatric comorbidity in one of the diagnostic
categories that have not been shown to have good success with opioid
therapy: conversion disorder; somatization disorder; pain disorder
associated with psychological factors (such as anxiety or depression,
or a previous history of substance abuse)? Only one practitioner
should be prescribing opioids. The lowest possible dose should be
prescribed to improve pain and function. The physician should document
ongoing review and documentation of pain relief, functional status,
appropriate medication use, and side effects. Satisfactory response
to treatment may be indicated by the patient's decreased pain, increased
level of function or improved quality of life.
There are other Guidelines that provide similar recommendations which
include:
- Institute For Clinical System Improvement (ICSC)
Health Care Guideline: Assessment and Management of Chronic Pain,
Fourth Edition, November 2009)
- Utah Clinical Guidelines
on Prescribing Opioids for Treatment of Pain
- Canadian
Guideline for Safe and Effective Use of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer
Pain
- Washington State Interagency Guideline on Opioid
Dosing for Chronic Non-cancer Pain
- The American Pain
Society: Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy
in Chronic Noncancer Pain
The reader is also
encouraged to view and download a copy of the American Chronic
Pain Association Consumer Guide to Pain Medications & Treatment
(I am the Senior Author).
In summary, while opioids can prove extremely effective in managing
chronic pain in certain individuals, their use is fraught with
serious problems. Opioids should be prescribed with extreme caution
and their sustained use must be justified by increased function,
decreased pain and manageable side-effects.
While not the focus
of this article, but highly relevant, is that a Functional Restoration
approach to chronic
pain treatment is recommended and strongly supported in the Introduction
to the current Chronic Pain Treatment Guideline in the California
DWC’s Medical Treatment Utilization
Schedule (MTUS).
1 DWC Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule (MTUS) Chronic
Pain Medical Treatment Guidelines.
Available at: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dwc/DWCPropRegs/MTUS_Regulations/MTUS_ChronicPainMedicalTreatment
Guidelines.pdf or http://tinyurl.com/MTUSCPMTG.
2 Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
CDC’s
Issue Brief: Unintentional Drug Poisoning in the United States. Available at:
http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecreationalSafety/Poisoning/brief.htm.2010.
3 Chou, R., Fanciullo, g, Fine,
p, Miaskowski, C, Passik, S., and Portenoy, R. “Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain: Prediction
and Identification of Aberrant Drug-Related Behaviors: A Review
of the Evidence for an American Pain Society and American Academy
of Pain Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline” in The Journal
of Pain, Vol 10, No 2 (February), 2009: pp 131-146.
4 BA Martell,
PG O'Connor, RD Kerns, WC Becker, KH Morales, TR Kosten and DA
Fiellin. "Systematic review: opioid treatment for chronic
back pain: prevalence, efficacy, and association with addiction." Annals
of Internal Medicine 146(2) (2007) 116-127.
5 Noble M, Tregear
SJ, Treadwell JR, Schoelles K: Longterm opioid therapy for chronic
oncancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy
and safety. J Pain Sympt Manage 35:214-228, 2008.
6 Furlan AD,Sandoval JA, Mailis-Gagnon A, Tunks E: Opioids
for chronic noncancer pain: A meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects.
CMAJ 174:1589-1594, 2006.
7 Kalso E, Edwards JE, Moore RA, McQuay HJ: Opioids in
chronic non-cancer pain: Systematic review of efficacy and safety. Pain 112:372-380,
2004.
8 Allan L, Richarz U, Simpson K, Slappendel R: Transdermal
fentanyl versus sustained release oral morphine in strong- opioid naive patients
with chronic low back pain. Spine 30: 2484-2490, 2005.
9 Hojsted J, Sjogren P: Addiction to opioids in chronic
pain patients: A literature review. Eur J Pain 11:490-518, 2007.
10 Moore RA, McQuay HJ: Prevalence of opioid adverse
events in chronic non- malignant pain: Systematic review of randomised trials
of oral opioids. Arthritis Res Ther 7:R1046-R1051, 2005.
11 Sacerdote P. Effects of opioids on the immune system:
experimental evidence for immunomodulatory effects of opioids. In: Machelska
H, Stein C, eds. Immune Mechanisms of Pain and Analgesia. Advances in Experimental
Medicine and Biology. Vol 521. Georgetown, Tex: Landes Bioscience; 2002.
12 Williams KL, Ko MC; Rice KC; and Woods JH. "Effect
of opioid receptor antagonists on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity in
rhesus monkeys."
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 28(4) (2003) 513-528.
13 Guido M, Romualdi D; and Lanzone A. "Role of opioid
antagonists in the treatment of women with glucoregulation abnormalities." Curr
Pharm Des. 12(8) (2006) 1001-1012.
14 J. Staedt, F. Wassmuth, G. Stoppe, G. Hajak, A. Rodenbeck,
W. Poser and E. Ruther. "Effects of chronic treatment with methadone and naltrexone
on sleep in addicts." European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
246(6) October 1996 305-309.
15 Dimsdale J, Norman D, Dejardin D, Wallace M. The
effects of opioids on sleep architecture. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Feb 15; 3 (1):33-36.
16 Celerier E, Laulin JP, Corcuff JB, Le Moal M, Simonnet
G (2001) Progressive enhancement of delayed hyperalgesia induced by repeated
heroin administration: a sensitization process. J Neurosci 21:4074-4080.
17 Sokolowska M, Siegel S, Kim JA Intraadministration
associations: conditional hyperalgesia elicited by morphine onset cues. J Exp
Psychol Anim Behav Process (United States), Jul 2002, 28(3) p309-320.
18 King T, Gardell LR, Wang R, et al. Role of NK-1 neurotransmission
in opioid- induced hyperalgesia. Pain (Netherlands), Aug 2005, 116(3) p276-288.
19 Celerier E, Laulin JP, Corcuff JB, Le Moal M, Simonnet
G (2001) Progressive enhancement of delayed hyperalgesia induced by repeated
heroin administration: a sensitization process. J Neurosci 21:4074-4080.
20 Gu G, Kondo I, Hua XY, et al. Resting and evoked
spinal substance P release during chronic intrathecal morphine infusion: parallels
with tolerance and dependence. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (United States), Sep 2005,
314(3) p1362- 1369.
21 Koppert, W. "Opioid-induced analgesia and hyperalgesia." Schmerz.
19(5) (2005) 392-394.
22 Passik, S. “Issues in Long-term Opioid Therapy: Unmet
Needs, Risks, and Solutions.” Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(7):593-601.
23 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study
http://www.cdc.gov/ace/findings.htm
24 Impact of Early Life Trauma on Health and Disease:
The Hidden Epidemic; R Lanius, E Vermetten, C Pain, eds.; Cambridge University,
Press, 2010; Chapter 8.
25 American College of Occupational and Environmental
Medicine. Occupational medicine practice guidelines, chronic pain chapter update.
Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Press. 2008.
26 Portenoy RK: Opioid therapy for chronic nonmalignant
pain: A review of the critical issues. J Pain Symptom manage 11:203-217, 1996.
27 American College of Occupational and Environmental
Medicine. Occupational medicine practice guidelines, chronic pain chapter update.
Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Press. 2008.
28 Official Disability Guidelines at http://www.odg-twc.com
29 Institute For Clinical System Improvement (ICSC)
Health Care Guideline: Assessment and Management of Chronic Pain, Fourth Edition,
November 2009) - http://tinyurl.com/ICSI-Chronic-Pain.
30 Utah Clinical Guidelines on Prescribing Opioids for
Treatment of Pain. Available at:
http://www.useonlyasdirected.org/uploads/UDOH
Opioid Guidelines Summary(2).pdf. 2009.
31 Canadian Guideline for Safe and Effective Use of
Opioids for Chronic Non- Cancer Pain.
Available at: http://nationalpaincentre.mcmaster.ca/opioid.
2010.
32 Washington State Interagency Guideline on Opioid
Dosing for Chronic Non- cancer Pain.
Available at:
http://www.agencymeddirectors.wa.gov/opioiddosing.asp. 2010 Update.
33 Opioid Treatment Guidelines: Clinical Guidelines
for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain. The Journal
of Pain, Vol 10, No 2 (February), 2009: pp 113-130.
Available at:
http://www.useonlyasdirected.org/uploads/APS-
AAPM Chronic Opioid Therapy Guidelines.pdf or
http://tinyurl.com/APS-CP-Guideline
34 American Chronic Pain Association Consumer Guide
to Pain Medications &
Treatment.
Available at:
http://www.theacpa.org/uploads/ACPA_Consumer_Guide_2011
final.pdf or
http://tinyurl.com/ACPA-Consumer-Guide-2011
35 Functional Restoration and Chronic Pain Management.
Steven D. Feinberg, MD, Rachel M. Feinberg, PT, DPT, & Robert J. Gatchel, PhD,
ABPP in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 20(3): 221-235
(2008).
36 DWC Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule (MTUS)
Chronic Pain Medical Treatment Guidelines.
Available at:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dwc/DWCPropRegs/MTUS_Regulations/MTUS_ChronicPainMedicalTreatment
Guidelines.pdf or
http://tinyurl.com/MTUSCPMTG.
|